Dreadnought USS Texas (BB-35) · an unofficial enthusiast archive
Sixteen guides · five sections
Browse the whole archive
A hull that was rebuilt around while staying the same hull.

Service History · 03

What Was Added, and What Was Taken Off

A hull that served for thirty years while being steadily unmade and remade above the waterline.

By the archive·Service History·4 min read

A hull that served for thirty years while being steadily unmade and remade above the waterline.

01The Ship That Launched Was Not the Ship That Served

USS Texas commissioned in 1914 as a New York-class dreadnought, and the hull that entered the water was shaped by the assumptions of that moment: basket masts, spotting tops, coal-fired boilers, and a weapons fit calibrated to a particular theory of naval warfare. Within a few years, almost every one of those assumptions would be revised — not by designing a new ship, but by working on the one already in service.

The changes came in waves, each driven by operational experience or the shifting priorities of the Navy. Some were additive: equipment bolted, welded, or rigged onto a hull that had not been designed to carry it. Some were subtractive: structures removed because they were tactically obsolete, dangerously exposed, or simply in the way of what was being added. Taken together, they amount to a running reconstruction that lasted the length of her active career.

The masts are the most visible early example. Texas launched with the distinctive cage masts — open lattice structures, characteristic of American capital ships of that era, intended to remain standing even after absorbing shellfire that would bring down a pole mast. They were tall, prominent, and useful as fire-control platforms. They were also poorly suited to the increasingly sophisticated fire-control equipment that the Navy was developing in the interwar period. By the 1920s, the cage masts had been replaced by tripod structures, which were more rigid, offered better mounting points for directors and rangefinders, and changed the ship's silhouette entirely. The spotting tops moved with them, higher and differently arranged.

The conversion from coal to oil fuel, completed in 1925, was arguably the most consequential single change to her machinery and internal arrangement. The coal bunkers that had defined her range, her crew requirements, and the brutal labour of her stokehold were converted or repurposed. Oil stowage went in. The stokehold gangs — the men whose job had been to shovel coal into furnaces at a pace the boilers demanded — were no longer needed in those numbers. Her range increased, her coaling stops disappeared, and a form of shipboard work that had defined capital-ship operation since the beginning of the steam era simply ended aboard her.

Key facts · terms used on this page

Plate 03
cage mast
open lattice mast designed to remain standing after shellfire damage
tripod mast
three-legged rigid mast replacing cage type, better suited to fire-control equipment
blister
external bulge added along waterline for protection and stability
stokehold
compartment where crew shovelled coal into boilers
palimpsest
layered document or object where earlier content underlies later revisions
director
elevated fire-control station transmitting aim data to gun crews

02Added Weight, Redistributed Purpose

The Second World War brought the most aggressive phase of modification. Anti-aircraft armament was the immediate pressure: the threat from aircraft changed the calculus of what a battleship needed to carry, and Texas received successive additions and upgrades to her anti-aircraft fit across the early 1940s. Guns were added in numbers and positions that the original design had never anticipated. Platforms were built out from the superstructure to carry them. Director systems and fire-control equipment for the new weapons came with their own weight and their own topside footprint.

These additions had consequences. Every ton added high in the ship affects her stability. Her blisters, fitted in the 1920s along her waterline to improve underwater protection and — critically — to recover the stability margin that earlier additions had reduced, had already been one answer to this equation. As weight continued to accumulate topside through the war years, the engineering relationship between beam, draft, freeboard, and centre of gravity had to be managed continuously. The blisters that had changed her beam and slowed her slightly in the 1920s were also, in retrospect, buying the margin that made the later wartime additions possible.

Some were additive: equipment bolted, welded, or rigged onto a hull that had not been designed to carry it.

What came off during this period was largely the product of the same logic. Fire-control arrangements that had been state of the art in 1925 were removed or superseded. Equipment associated with her role as a fleet unit — torpedo nets, certain secondary armaments, structures associated with earlier tactical concepts — disappeared as her actual wartime roles clarified. By the time she was supporting amphibious operations in the Atlantic and Pacific, she was a ship whose function had been precisely redefined by what remained and what had been stripped away.

a ship's boiler room with pipework and gauges
PLATE 2 — A boiler room: pipework, gauges and the apparatus of raising steam.
1914commissioning year
1925coal-to-oil conversion completed

03The Hull Underneath

The accumulation of changes across thirty years of service means that a detailed inspection of Texas today — the riveted plates, the frames, the structural members of the hull itself — reveals a baseline that is significantly older and more original than almost anything visible at deck level or above. The visible ship is a palimpsest: each layer of modification sitting over an earlier one, with the original hull beneath them all.

For marine historians and preservation engineers, this layering is both the challenge and the interest. What counts as the ship? What, once removed and not replaced, is simply gone? These are not abstract questions. They have direct bearing on what any restoration programme is working to recover — and on what, however carefully the work is done, is already beyond recovery.

Written from published engineering and heritage sources. Where a figure is not documented, this archive describes the engineering rather than asserting a number.

Chronology · stated as record

  1. 1914commissioned as built, cage masts, coal-fired
  2. 1920scage masts replaced with tripods; blisters added; coal-to-oil conversion
  3. Early 1940ssuccessive anti-aircraft additions, platforms extended, superstructure modified

Subjects and places referred to

USS Texas (BB-35)

Referred to on this page

New York-class dreadnought, now preserved at Galveston, Texas

New York class

Referred to on this page

two-ship class (Texas and New York) commissioned 1914